From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YpnUT-0000tt-Ak for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:47:10 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F281740B2CD for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 17:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55496477.50909@candelatech.com> Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 17:46:47 -0700 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Anyone tried ANQP query with ath10k? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k I have what I believe is an identical setup, except that one station is on ath9k, and another is on ath10k. The ath9k can query ANQP just fine. When sniffing, I never even see any ANQP queries go out for the ath10k station. Maybe I still have misconfiguration...I'm curious if anyone has tried this? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k