From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is veth in net-next reordering traffic?
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 09:01:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554B8C6D.70404@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430968617.14545.103.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On 05/06/2015 08:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:04 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>> I've been messing about with a setup approximating what an OpenStack
>> Nova Compute node creates for the private networking plumbing when using
>> OVX+VxLAN. Just without the VM. So, I have a linux bridge (named qbr),
>> a veth pair (named qvb and qvo) joining that to an OVS switch (called
>> br-int) which then has a patch pair joining that OVS bridge to another
>> OVS bridge (br-tun) which has a vxlan tunnel defined.
>
> veth can certainly reorder traffic, unless you use cpu binding with your
> netperf (sender side)
Is the seemingly high proportion of spurious retransmissions a concern?
(Assuming I'm looking at an interpreting correct stats):
Unbound:
root@qu-stbaz1-perf0000:~# netstat -s > beforestat; netperf -H
192.168.0.22 -l 30 -- -O throughput,local_transport_retrans; netstat -s
> afterstat;~raj/beforeafter beforestat afterstat | grep -i -e reord -e
dsack
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
192.168.0.22 () port 0 AF_INET : demo
Throughput Local
Transport
Retransmissions
2864.44 8892
Detected reordering 0 times using FACK
Detected reordering 334059 times using SACK
Detected reordering 9722 times using time stamp
5 congestion windows recovered without slow start by DSACK
0 DSACKs sent for old packets
8114 DSACKs received
0 DSACKs for out of order packets received
TCPDSACKIgnoredOld: 26
TCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo: 6153
Bound (CPU 1 picked arbitrarily):
root@qu-stbaz1-perf0000:~# netstat -s > beforestat; netperf -H
192.168.0.22 -l 30 -T 1 -- -O throughput,local_transport_retrans;
netstat -s > afterstat;~raj/beforeafter beforestat afterstat | grep -i
-e reord -e dsack
MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to
192.168.0.22 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : cpu bind
Throughput Local
Transport
Retransmissions
3278.14 4099
Detected reordering 0 times using FACK
Detected reordering 8154 times using SACK
Detected reordering 3 times using time stamp
1 congestion windows recovered without slow start by DSACK
0 DSACKs sent for old packets
669 DSACKs received
169 DSACKs for out of order packets received
TCPDSACKIgnoredOld: 0
TCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo: 37
I suppose then that is also why I see so many tx queues getting involved
in ixgbe for just a single stream?
(ethtool stats over a 5 second interval run through beforeafter)
5
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 541461
tx_packets: 1010748
rx_bytes: 63833156
tx_bytes: 1529215668
rx_pkts_nic: 541461
tx_pkts_nic: 1010748
rx_bytes_nic: 65998760
tx_bytes_nic: 1533258678
multicast: 14
fdir_match: 9
fdir_miss: 541460
tx_restart_queue: 150
tx_queue_0_packets: 927983
tx_queue_0_bytes: 1404085816
tx_queue_1_packets: 19872
tx_queue_1_bytes: 30086064
tx_queue_2_packets: 10650
tx_queue_2_bytes: 16121144
tx_queue_3_packets: 1200
tx_queue_3_bytes: 1815402
tx_queue_4_packets: 409
tx_queue_4_bytes: 619226
tx_queue_5_packets: 459
tx_queue_5_bytes: 694926
tx_queue_8_packets: 49715
tx_queue_8_bytes: 75096650
tx_queue_16_packets: 460
tx_queue_16_bytes: 696440
rx_queue_0_packets: 10
rx_queue_0_bytes: 654
rx_queue_3_packets: 541437
rx_queue_3_bytes: 63830248
rx_queue_6_packets: 14
rx_queue_6_bytes: 2254
Versus a bound netperf:
5
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 1123827
tx_packets: 1619156
rx_bytes: 140008757
tx_bytes: 2450188854
rx_pkts_nic: 1123816
tx_pkts_nic: 1619197
rx_bytes_nic: 144502745
tx_bytes_nic: 2456723162
multicast: 13
fdir_match: 4
fdir_miss: 1123834
tx_restart_queue: 757
tx_queue_0_packets: 1373194
tx_queue_0_bytes: 2078088490
tx_queue_1_packets: 245959
tx_queue_1_bytes: 372099706
tx_queue_13_packets: 3
tx_queue_13_bytes: 658
rx_queue_0_packets: 4
rx_queue_0_bytes: 264
rx_queue_3_packets: 1123810
rx_queue_3_bytes: 140006400
rx_queue_6_packets: 13
rx_queue_6_bytes: 2093
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 2:04 Is veth in net-next reordering traffic? Rick Jones
2015-05-07 3:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-07 16:01 ` Rick Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554B8C6D.70404@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.