From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554C3617.10906@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgT8aa5svHgLbkNkSPXWT_hLez8e4cBws2ajEB9p56WHFA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.05.2015 13:01, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krysztof,
>
> Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
> I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
> cpufreq-exynos.
It does not have to be energy consumption. It may be something else
visible, like wrong values for clock rates. I don't know, it is your
patch so you should know *what is fixed* (or changed).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <554C3617.10906@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgT8aa5svHgLbkNkSPXWT_hLez8e4cBws2ajEB9p56WHFA@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.05.2015 13:01, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krysztof,
>
> Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
> I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
> cpufreq-exynos.
It does not have to be energy consumption. It may be something else
visible, like wrong values for clock rates. I don't know, it is your
patch so you should know *what is fixed* (or changed).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-08 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 17:48 [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout_kpll clock Anand Moon
2015-05-07 17:48 ` Anand Moon
2015-05-08 0:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-08 0:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-05-08 4:01 ` Anand Moon
2015-05-08 4:01 ` Anand Moon
2015-05-08 4:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-05-08 4:05 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=554C3617.10906@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.