From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xen/vm_access: Support for memory-content hiding Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 18:11:29 +0300 Message-ID: <554E23A1.7060400@bitdefender.com> References: <1430932352-4289-1-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> <1430932352-4289-3-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> <554CFB760200007800078703@mail.emea.novell.com> <554CE8FC.5040305@bitdefender.com> <554DAF57.3060105@bitdefender.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tamas K Lengyel Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , "wei.liu2@citrix.com" , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan , Jan Beulich , "Dong, Eddie" , "Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com" , Jun Nakajima , Keir Fraser , Boris Ostrovsky , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/09/2015 11:33 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > Ah yes, I missed the fact that you put it into a union with regs. I > guess as long as it's the same size as regs it's fine. However, I > think the union will have to be named. Sure, I can name it. When I was working on it I was under the impression that it's important to not disturb the API. I've since understood from Andrew and Jan that that's not an issue. Thanks, Razvan