All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	phoeagon <phoeagon@gmail.com>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 18:02:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554F8117.1070800@weilnetz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554F72E6.5060001@redhat.com>

Am 10.05.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
> On 09/05/2015 05:54, phoeagon wrote:
>> zheq-PC sdb # time ~/qemu-sync-test/bin/qemu-img convert -f raw -t writeback -O vdi /run/shm/rand 1.vdi
>>
>> real0m8.678s
>> user0m0.169s
>> sys0m0.500s
>>
>> zheq-PC sdb # time qemu-img convert -f raw -t writeback -O vdi /run/shm/rand 1.vdi
>> real0m4.320s
>> user0m0.148s
>> sys0m0.471s
> This means that 3.83 seconds are spent when bdrv_close() calls
> bdrv_flush().  That's the only difference between writeback
> and unsafe in qemu-img convert.
>
> The remaining part of the time (4.85 seconds instead of 0.49
> seconds) means that, at least on your hardware, sequential writes
> to unallocated space become 10 times slower with your patch.
>
> Since the default qemu-img convert case isn't slowed down, I
> would think that correctness trumps performance.  Nevertheless,
> it's a huge difference.
>
> Paolo

I doubt that the convert case isn't slowed down.

Writing to a tmpfs as it was obviously done for the test is not a 
typical use case.
With real hard disks I expect a significant slowdown.

Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-10 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-07  4:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] block/vdi: Use bdrv_flush after metadata updates Zhe Qiu
2015-05-07 10:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-07 15:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Eric Blake
2015-05-07 15:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Zhe Qiu
2015-05-08 13:14   ` Max Reitz
2015-05-08 13:55     ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 14:43       ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 21:26       ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-09  3:54         ` phoeagon
2015-05-09  3:59           ` phoeagon
2015-05-09  6:39             ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-09  7:41               ` phoeagon
2015-05-10 15:01           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-10 16:02             ` Stefan Weil [this message]
2015-05-10 16:05               ` phoeagon
2015-05-10 16:10               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-10 16:26                 ` Stefan Weil
2015-05-10 17:14                   ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3] " Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 11:50   ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 12:02     ` Kevin Wolf
2015-05-08 12:56       ` phoeagon
2015-05-08 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554F8117.1070800@weilnetz.de \
    --to=sw@weilnetz.de \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=phoeagon@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.