From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next hammer release v0.94.2 Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 14:21:26 +0200 Message-ID: <55509EC6.2060503@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JBQ1M1JqkD22frD9XftwsRiiKVxQ01hAf" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:32898 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751290AbbEKMV2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2015 08:21:28 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JBQ1M1JqkD22frD9XftwsRiiKVxQ01hAf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, The next hammer release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/ham= mer passed the fs suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#fs), which = also includes your last minute addition https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull= /4629. Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testin= g ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into hammer since v0.94.1 in case you n= eed more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --JBQ1M1JqkD22frD9XftwsRiiKVxQ01hAf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVQnsYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22exgCfTakjKUGlQzXuRx//nx1pxBpr HTQAmgLzznDNxvZGq1ptYJkq1ylMdP2R =Q7CM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JBQ1M1JqkD22frD9XftwsRiiKVxQ01hAf--