From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: doug.hatch@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scott.norton@hp.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the more descriptive set_mb()
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:50:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5550DDD5.1040004@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150511145408.GU27504@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 05/11/2015 10:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:43:55AM -0700, tip-bot for Waiman Long wrote:
>> - (void)xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_halted);
>> + set_mb(pn->state, vcpu_halted);
> Hmm, so I looked at the set_mb() definitions and I figure we want to do
> something like the below, right?
Yes, I think we should do that just to be safe from unexpected compiler
optimization.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h | 2 +-
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
> 10 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> index d2f81e6b8c1c..993150aea681 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ do { \
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> #define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 71f19c4dc0de..ff7de78d01b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ do { \
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
> #define nop() asm volatile("nop");
>
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index f6769eb2bbf9..03117e7b2ab8 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ do { \
> * acquire vs release semantics but we can't discuss this stuff with
> * Linus just yet. Grrr...
> */
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { (var) = (value); mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> /*
> * The group barrier in front of the rsm& ssm are necessary to ensure
> diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> index d703d8e26a65..97eb018a2933 100644
> --- a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline void fence(void)
> #define read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
> #define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while (0)
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 2b8bbbcb9be0..cff1bbdaa74a 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
> #endif
>
> #define set_mb(var, value) \
> - do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> + do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_llsc_mb() __asm__ __volatile__(__WEAK_LLSC_MB : : :"memory")
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> index a3bf5be111ff..2a072e48780d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> #define rmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
> #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> #ifdef __SUBARCH_HAS_LWSYNC
> # define SMPWMB LWSYNC
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 8d724718ec21..b66cd53d35fc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> #define smp_mb__before_atomic() smp_mb()
> #define smp_mb__after_atomic() smp_mb()
>
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
>
> #define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> index 76648941fea7..125fec7512f4 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ do { __asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt %%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
> #define dma_wmb() wmb()
>
> #define set_mb(__var, __value) \
> - do { __var = __value; membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
> + do { WRITE_ONCE(__var, __value); membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define smp_mb() mb()
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 959e45b81fe2..9de5cde133a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> #define smp_mb() barrier()
> #define smp_rmb() barrier()
> #define smp_wmb() barrier()
> -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
> +#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); barrier(); } while (0)
That part is in the !CONFIG_SMP portion. I don't think we need to change it.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-52c9d2badd1ae4d11c29de57d4e964e48afd3cb4@git.kernel.org>
2015-05-11 14:54 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the more descriptive set_mb() Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-11 16:50 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-05-11 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-12 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5550DDD5.1040004@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.