From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B8B99E00997; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (mar.krzeminski[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06677E004F6 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lagv1 with SMTP id v1so97919804lag.3 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; bh=ECrJvaFzbO4noDMrpuc9LoqPrUrLw0xnregqTYZjViM=; b=xQdYF9OfE1x1On3EmZZrCJxxh/BWFYslbbTlz2Cv/BxlTM92FpKScpbnqVK4TY3tqE FqKEAM4oI2R+pJtzc9gBiboVaAvpcCUha/Ckzf12EfAZrfOgdUYbrk+avUUGtX9NVouY gjOBq/tKhZ5u9tQMk9aPne0tny40XMir+NBLTxMzZR5rN5b/C5eVBgHm5BvjRqrvK1cJ 79PnZ8+LIapRqwFBdXhPexOV0r4NCPAYjNHGWsXuSZwrTTPGID0N9hCBcChR6EGc3Jjq tBPU/Zj9TtogUNK+PWGeDPUOdL30S8oMJbOsdXmJDjZNA2ssoB8RMY69xD+yzVtfq68D dTdQ== X-Received: by 10.112.202.194 with SMTP id kk2mr9009973lbc.0.1431363870850; Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.50.2] (89-70-157-137.dynamic.chello.pl. [89.70.157.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kf8sm3172504lbc.0.2015.05.11.10.04.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 10:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5550E11C.4010400@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:04:28 +0200 From: "mar.krzeminski" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Qemu - problem with nfs filesytem X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 17:04:33 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000305000205020600040206" --------------000305000205020600040206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I want to set up a nfs user space server using runqemu-export-rootfs.sh script. When I run the unmodified script my exported filesystem can not be seen, but when I remove parameters: -x $NFS_NFSPROG and -y $NFS_MOUNTPRO from unfsd and remove corresponding command line parameters all is working fine. Those parameters are responsible for setting rpc ports for nfs service. Google says there is some patch to kernel allowing rpc services or higher port in yocto: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-September/002741.html, but I can not see them in poky 1.6. I am using kernel 3.14. Is there any patches that I need to apply, or maybe I do something wrong? Regards, Marcin ** --------------000305000205020600040206 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all,

I want to set up a nfs user space server using runqemu-export-rootfs.sh script.
When I run the unmodified script my exported filesystem can not be seen,
but when I remove parameters: -x $NFS_NFSPROG and -y $NFS_MOUNTPRO from unfsd
and remove corresponding command line parameters all is working fine.
Those parameters are responsible for setting rpc ports for nfs service.

Google says there is some patch to kernel allowing rpc services or higher port in yocto:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-September/002741.html, but I can not see them in poky 1.6.
I am using kernel 3.14. Is there any patches that I need to apply, or maybe I do something wrong?

Regards,
Marcin
--------------000305000205020600040206--