All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Emmerich <emmericp@net.in.tum.de>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: TX performance regression caused by the mbuf cachline split
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:18:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555138C7.5010002@net.in.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55512DE5.7010800@net.in.tum.de>

Found a really simple solution that almost restores the original 
performance: just add a prefetch on alloc. For some reason, I assumed 
that this was already done since the troublesome commit I investigated 
mentioned something about prefetching... I guess the commit referred to 
the hardware prefetcher in the CPU.

Adding an explicit prefetch command in the mbuf alloc function gives a 
throughput of 12.7/10.35 Mpps in my benchmark with the 
simple/full-featured tx path.

DPDK 1.7.1 was at 14.1/10.7 Mpps. I guess I can live with that, since 
I'm primarily interested in the full-featured path and the drop from 
10.7 to ~10.4 was due to another change.

Patch: https://github.com/dpdk-org/dpdk/pull/2
I also sent an email to the mailing list.

I also think that the rx-path could also benefit from prefetching somewhere.


Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-11  0:14 TX performance regression caused by the mbuf cachline split Paul Emmerich
2015-05-11  9:13 ` Luke Gorrie
2015-05-11 10:16   ` Paul Emmerich
2015-05-11 22:32 ` Paul Emmerich
2015-05-11 23:18   ` Paul Emmerich [this message]
2015-05-12  0:28     ` Marc Sune
2015-05-12  0:38       ` Marc Sune
2015-05-13  9:03     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-15 19:15       ` Paul Emmerich
2016-02-19 12:31         ` Olivier MATZ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555138C7.5010002@net.in.tum.de \
    --to=emmericp@net.in.tum.de \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.