From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 12 May 2015 10:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:52443 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27012150AbbELIZzan0WR (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2015 10:25:55 +0200 Received: from KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (unknown [192.168.5.35]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id ECB6629011969; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:25:49 +0100 (IST) Received: from LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org (192.168.152.62) by KLMAIL01.kl.imgtec.org (192.168.5.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:23:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.154.77] (192.168.154.77) by LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org (192.168.152.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:23:48 +0100 Message-ID: <5551B894.9000204@imgtec.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:23:48 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Kinard , Linux MIPS List , Matthew Fortune Subject: Re: IP28: "Inconsistent ISA" messages during kernel build References: <55516EF3.7010706@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <55516EF3.7010706@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.154.77] Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 47337 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: Markos.Chandras@imgtec.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On 05/12/2015 04:09 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > Has anyone tried to build an IP28 kernel lately? I've been getting quite a few > warnings out of the linker regarding e_flags and the new .MIPS.abiflags stuff. > Not seen it on the other SGI platforms, so I am assuming this has something to > do with what flags are passed to the compiler/linker. > > mips64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: fs/ext4/symlink.o: warning: Inconsistent ISA > between e_flags and .MIPS.abiflags > mips64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: fs/ext4/symlink.o: warning: Inconsistent ISA > extensions between e_flags and .MIPS.abiflags > > Seeing this on a build of 4.0.2 based off of a 20150418 checkout from git. > > --J > Hi, I presume you are using binutils >= 2.25? I have seen this problem in my local build tests as well and I discussed this with Matthew (now on CC). It seems it's an 'innocent' warning added to binutils 2.25 but I am not sure if this is now fixed or not. Matthew might be able to provide more information. -- markos