From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] xenalyze: add to tools/xentrace/xenalyze Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:09:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5551C355.5060203@eu.citrix.com> References: <1430994944-20471-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1430994944-20471-2-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <20150511141515.GA14629@aepfle.de> <1431354212.8263.65.camel@citrix.com> <5550BDA7.7020008@eu.citrix.com> <1431420319.8263.81.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431420319.8263.81.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Ian Jackson , Olaf Hering , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/12/2015 09:45 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 15:33 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/11/2015 03:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:15 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 07, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Olaf Hering wrote: >>>> >>>>>> tools/xentrace/xenalyze/Makefile | 21 + >>>> >>>>> I personally think it would make more sense to just put the xenalyze >>>>> directory in tools/. >>> >>> What (if anything) is the relationship between xentrace and xenalyze? >>> >>> I think the latter post processes the result of the former, is that >>> right? >> >> Yes. So someone might argue that, both having to do with the xen >> tracing system, they should live in the same directory; that's where >> xentrace_format lives, after all. >> >> However, all xentrace does is basically map the hypervisor buffers and >> dump them to disk. Other than that, there is no functional overlap >> between them. >> >> It looks like olaf is only checking in the core xenalyze binary, not the >> other side bits (like the html documentation), so keeping them in the >> same directory might make sense. > > You mean to put xenalyze directly into xentrace (i.e. merging it with > the current contents)? I was speaking of putting xenalyze into the xentrace directory. That directory already has xentrace, xentrace_setsize, xenctx, and xentrace_format. I'd prefer it be in its own directory (tools/xenalyze), but either way works for me. (I suspect xentrace_setsize probably *should* be merged in with xentrace as a command-line option; and xenctx should be rationalized with the other version of it -- hvmctx or something?) -George