From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717773D16 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 22:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhj9 with SMTP id hj9so28610072igb.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/okHJNshCA9QZqJMkn53KdQn+VzLZlkY8M62zz9gt9k=; b=K7df3AhiVfDnFRQBFihQL/HWWlRsnOsvsbMQWjpnDb5D/dQ9ZC8X+/FTiJ4nf1hUWR m9cwDnHjGi53B7vTnY+WtSMVyz0nTW9S4cSjeP26Q9qo11PO1GbktgQt9utgbzdeXjFU hqaBmO8Sk2L5ovjDlsMKFH6hnUX0X+rRQISSbQDaIZZspQBDMXRGZY1u/Xur14X4T3KD TbylBcj5IQ65C6Fnph7DPbYtwsfbfNPkwvWhuT7v7WmMbEb/iC1XZ1SKTaCu/ewo/Tys n6MREQbGbyTCYyQ/LUlJoCF4E2a/Hg8EH8VJb46w/A5vv86LfV/7MzaKuMNsQEIuGoza xQsQ== X-Received: by 10.42.152.67 with SMTP id h3mr5602912icw.56.1431469150522; Tue, 12 May 2015 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x4sm12825341iod.26.2015.05.12.15.19.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2015 15:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55527C5A.4010900@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 18:19:06 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1431070955-7100-1-git-send-email-yi.zhao@windriver.com> <20150511092704.GH2400@jama> <10765250.9tBgYfV1HJ@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20150512144510.GC2714@jama> In-Reply-To: <20150512144510.GC2714@jama> Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 01/20] smstools: fix PN -> BPN for multilib X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 22:19:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/12/15 10:45, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Monday 11 May 2015 11:27:04 Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:42:16PM +0800, Yi Zhao wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao >>> Changes 03, 18, 20 didn't make it to patchwork, because they were marked >>> as Spam by gmail >> Hang on, I'm confused. Why should the patches being marked as spam in gmail >> have any bearing on whether they should show up in patchwork? Surely gmail >> shouldn't be involved in the sending part, only subsequently when the mail is >> sent from the mailing list to you (since you use gmail)? > Isn't patchwork reading some gmail account over imap? > > The list of patches not appearing in patchwork is exactly matching with > patches marked as spam in my inbox, so I believe that the same is > happening in patchwork's gmail account. Does anyone know if it helps when I notice them in "Spam" and mark them as "Not Spam"?