From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 09:10:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5552EAD4.7070806@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150512190348.GA4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
On 05/12/2015 10:03 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:44:36PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>> No need to clear one struct i2c_client member variable since memset has
>> already cleared all of them. Remove also one space intendation from err
>> label.
>
> Ehrm, why change this now when you remove the code block in the next
> patch anyhow? :)
>
Actually second patch is not removing any other code blocks than memset
so my 2 seconds thinking said lets put that client.flags = 0; removal to
another patch especially after finding the err label indentation, i.e.
spring cleanings first and then the actual patch :-)
> Also, the indentation thing is very likely intentional. Sadly, I can't
> remember why at this moment, but I remember that when I tried to grep
> something I understood why some people put a space in front of labels
>
Probably it makes code look better in some cases when there are multiple
labels but here it didn't look consistent with the rest of the file.
I don't mind squashing this into second patch or keep them separate. I'd
like to resend anyway because I noticed s/intendation/indentation/
misspelling in the commit log here.
--
Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-29 12:44 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1430311477-21759-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-29 12:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: core: Reduce stack size of acpi_i2c_space_handler() Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1430311477-21759-2-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-12 19:05 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150512190505.GB4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-13 6:58 ` Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <20150513065812.GB1490-3PARRvDOhMZrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 13:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarkko Nikula
[not found] ` <1432129012-26648-1-git-send-email-jarkko.nikula-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-02 15:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-05-12 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: core: Remove needless structure member zero initialization Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20150512190348.GA4449-oo5tB6JMkjKRinMKxDlMNPwbnWRJjS81@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-13 6:10 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5552EAD4.7070806@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.