From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: Status of VM event patches (Was: Xen 4.6 Development Update (four months reminder) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:40:40 +0300 Message-ID: <5552FFF8.2070307@bitdefender.com> References: <5552EC9F.4050404@bitdefender.com> <555313930200007800079D44@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YsRHU-0003tg-S4 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 07:40:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: <555313930200007800079D44@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/13/2015 10:04 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.05.15 at 08:18, wrote: >> On 05/13/2015 08:01 AM, wei.liu2@citrix.com wrote: >>> * VM event patches (none) >>> Add support for XSETBV vm_events, >>> Support hybernating guests >>> Support for VMCALL-based vm_events >>> - Razvan Cojocaru >> >> I've actually sent the first version of the series last week (called >> "Vm_event memory introspection helpers"). >> >> There are two major issues that need to be addressed before I can send V2: >> >> 1. I've had no review whatsoever for "[PATCH 5/5] xen: Write CR0, CR3 >> and CR4 in arch_set_info_guest()" - it has been neither acked nor >> criticized. > > It still sits in my to be looked at queue, which - as said elsewhere > a few minutes ago - is rather long right now. Please (you and > others) understand that contributions to projects do not only > consist of submitting patches, but also reviewing such submitted > by others. If that doesn't happen and all the reviewing load is > on very few people (who certainly have other work to do as well), > patch submitters have to live with (perhaps significant) delays. Of course, I wasn't complaining at all, just trying to be as accurate as possible in replying to Wei's request for information. I do appreciate the work the reviewers are doing, and respect their busy schedule. Thanks again, Razvan