From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mario Limonciello Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437 Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:17:06 -0500 Message-ID: <5554F4B2.8080801@dell.com> References: <1429759476-13186-1-git-send-email-alex.hung@canonical.com> <20150424082115.GA3783@srcf.ucam.org> <20150427174646.GA22664@srcf.ucam.org> <20150428052448.GA3458@srcf.ucam.org> <20150428171100.GA24599@srcf.ucam.org> <5554F12A.3010003@dell.com> <20150514191358.GB23853@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ausc60ps301.us.dell.com ([143.166.148.206]:50843 "EHLO ausc60ps301.us.dell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964971AbbENTRZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 15:17:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150514191358.GB23853@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Alex Hung , Linux ACPI Mailing List On 05/14/2015 02:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > >> * Battery information was not displayed in the OS. The BIOS team >> found that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS >> in the same way that Windows does. The delta path creates a SMI >> event to get battery information. > Huh. Is there any chance we can find out what the difference is so we > can make them equivalent? > That was my reaction too. I'm asking for some technical details on this.