From: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mturquette@linaro.org, haojian.zhuang@gmail.com,
james.hogan@imgtec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: divider: don't set_rate with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:52:54 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55555176.3060703@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150512235910.GC14873@codeaurora.org>
Hi Stephen,
On 05/13/2015 08:59 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/07, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> Even if use CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag, divider setting can be changed
>> by set_rate callback. Don't change divider setting from set_rate
>> callback of divider with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>
> Is the rate actually changing? Or is it just a problem that we
> may be writing the register to the same value it already is?
>
If rate and parant_rate are different, it can write the register to
different value. Even if the value is same but i think it's unnecessary
to re-write the register.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-07 7:46 [PATCH 1/2] clk: divider: don't set_rate with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag Joonyoung Shim
2015-04-07 7:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: divider: fix to set parent rate from " Joonyoung Shim
2015-05-12 23:25 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 23:25 ` Michael Turquette
2015-05-12 23:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-15 2:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-06-04 22:42 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-12 23:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: divider: don't set_rate with " Stephen Boyd
2015-05-15 1:52 ` Joonyoung Shim [this message]
2015-06-04 22:44 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55555176.3060703@samsung.com \
--to=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.