From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan Cutler Subject: master vs. next Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:44:25 +0200 Message-ID: <5555B1E9.3010003@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35251 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933738AbbEOIo1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 04:44:27 -0400 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E5CAD1F for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org I'm a newcomer to the ceph project. SubmittingPatches says to target next for bugfixes and master for features. Beyond that I only have the vaguest notion of what the next branch is for and how patches get moved back and forth between master and next. Can anyone comment? -- Nathan Cutler Software Engineer Distributed Storage SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. Tel.: +420 284 084 037