All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: "Gerhard Uttenthaler" <uttenthaler@ems-wuensche.com>,
	"François Beaulier" <fbeaulier@orange.fr>,
	"Yegor Yefremov" <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux board with 10 CANs
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:48:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5555EB16.4090903@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5555E8DC.7050209@ems-wuensche.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]

On 05/15/2015 02:38 PM, Gerhard Uttenthaler wrote:

>> Module based solutions are too expensive, whether it is PCIe or
>> USB. There are some bridge chips PCIe <-> memory, but i'm not
>> familiar with that. And you are right the SJA1000 is an old 5V
>> beast !

> Also a point to consider is that the speed you can read a SJA1000 chip
> is based on the clock frequency of this chip. And you have to
> read/write byte by byte. This may be too slow for 10 channels.

A local memory bus may be faster for single byte/word accesses than a
PCIe bus. I'm not a hardware guy, though :)

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15  7:56 Linux board with 10 CANs François Beaulier
2015-05-15  8:20 ` Yegor Yefremov
2015-05-15  8:50   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15  9:11   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15  9:33     ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 10:24       ` Andri Yngvason
2015-05-15 12:40         ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 12:47           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15 13:04             ` AW: [BULK]Re: " Uwe Wilhelm (PEAK-System)
2015-05-15 13:17               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15 13:20                 ` AW: " Uwe Wilhelm (PEAK-System)
2015-05-15 14:18               ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 12:38       ` Gerhard Uttenthaler
2015-05-15 12:48         ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2015-05-15 13:54 ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-18  9:07   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18 13:31     ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-20 11:35       ` Gediminas Simanskis
2015-05-21  3:19         ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-15 15:24 ` Tom Evans
2015-05-18  9:25   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18  9:40     ` Gerhard Bertelsmann
2015-05-18 11:13       ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18 12:56       ` Tom Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5555EB16.4090903@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=fbeaulier@orange.fr \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uttenthaler@ems-wuensche.com \
    --cc=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.