From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung arm64 DT updates for v4.1 Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 12:39:21 +0900 Message-ID: <5556BBE9.6030007@kernel.org> References: <555248E5.6010709@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:40376 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992648AbbEPDj2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2015 23:39:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: cw00.choi@samsung.com Cc: Chanwoo Choi , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson On 05/14/15 22:56, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Kukjin, [...] >> As you know, the arm64-exynos5433 couldn't be sent to upstream during >> previous merge window because it cannot be built without other stuff >> such as board DT file. I think, you need to post its regarding board DT >> file, I could test the exynos5433 series in my side with smdk5433 dt >> file though. Maybe as you know, I have no plan to upstream the smdk5433 >> DT file because it will not be used outside of Samsung S.LSI. > > Thanks for your test about Exynos5433 patch-set. > But, I cannot send the DTS file for Exynos5433 right now. > On the next, I'll send the Exynos5433's patchset and board dts file. > OK, I see. I think, maybe you can make a patch for board DT file based on v4.2-next/dt64-samsung branch in samsung tree. Thanks, Kukjin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene@kernel.org (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 12:39:21 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL 4/5] Samsung arm64 DT updates for v4.1 In-Reply-To: References: <555248E5.6010709@kernel.org> Message-ID: <5556BBE9.6030007@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/14/15 22:56, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Kukjin, [...] >> As you know, the arm64-exynos5433 couldn't be sent to upstream during >> previous merge window because it cannot be built without other stuff >> such as board DT file. I think, you need to post its regarding board DT >> file, I could test the exynos5433 series in my side with smdk5433 dt >> file though. Maybe as you know, I have no plan to upstream the smdk5433 >> DT file because it will not be used outside of Samsung S.LSI. > > Thanks for your test about Exynos5433 patch-set. > But, I cannot send the DTS file for Exynos5433 right now. > On the next, I'll send the Exynos5433's patchset and board dts file. > OK, I see. I think, maybe you can make a patch for board DT file based on v4.2-next/dt64-samsung branch in samsung tree. Thanks, Kukjin