From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
qemu-ppc <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] macio: Convert to realize()
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 14:42:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55573B3B.1030800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pp629csz.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On 15.05.15 15:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>
>> On 17.03.15 08:46, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 09.03.15 19:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27.02.15 13:43, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>>>> Convert device models "macio-oldworld" and "macio-newworld".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Depends on my "[PATCH 00/10] pci: Partial conversion to realize",
>>>>>>> which is in Michael's latest pull request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please poke me again when it landed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Applies cleanly to master now (commit 277263e).
>>>>
>>>> Hrm, does not seem to apply cleanly now. How about we postpone this to
>>>> 2.4? It's not really crucial for 2.3 and we're in hard freeze now.
>>>
>>> Sad (it's been on list for almost three weeks, most of the time waiting
>>> for the PCI pull), but it's clearly your choice to make.
>>
>> Yeah, but we're past hard freeze and I'd consider this not critical
>> enough to warrant potential breakage.
>>
>>> git-am doesn't dare to apply the patch on list, but git-cherry-pick
>>> applies the commit from which it was formatted without a peep. Result
>>> appended, just in case you'd like to consider it.
>>
>> Awesome, that was quick. Thanks, applied to ppc-next-2.4.
>
> Pull request ETA? I don't mean to be pushy, but I've been trying to get
> this in since February, and I got more work depending on it...
Some of the patches in David's latest spapr queue are regressing
compilation on older libfdt versions right now. If I don't see patches
to fix this, I'll just remove them from my queue again.
I could also use some help triaging the current autotest failures:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc-autotest/2015-05/msg00003.html
A good amount of those is probably upstream kernel breakage, but it'd be
good to know for sure.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-16 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 12:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] macio: Convert to realize() Markus Armbruster
2015-02-27 14:55 ` Alexander Graf
2015-02-27 15:26 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-09 18:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-17 7:26 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-17 7:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-03-17 7:50 ` Alexander Graf
2015-05-15 13:43 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-05-16 12:42 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2015-05-18 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
2015-05-18 8:59 ` Peter Maydell
2015-05-18 9:28 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55573B3B.1030800@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.