From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] linux-stubdomain: Compile Linux Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:55:02 +0100 Message-ID: <5559C506.4090608@eu.citrix.com> References: <1423022775-7132-1-git-send-email-eshelton@pobox.com> <1423022775-7132-3-git-send-email-eshelton@pobox.com> <1431595717.13579.16.camel@citrix.com> <1431945938.4944.33.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1431945938.4944.33.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Anthony PERARD , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini , Eric Shelton List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/18/2015 11:45 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 11:37 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> So my unscientific poll (more details below) >> >> 1. Download tarball: 80MB, 111s (<2m) >> >> 2. git clone --depth 1: 138MiB, 392s. (~6m30s) >> >> I'd just go for the tarball, but I'll leave that decision up to you guys. > > TBH I don't think we should accept either of those in xen.git. > > The way to pursue Linux stubdomains further would seem to be via Raisin > anyway. +1 -G