From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:47:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5559DF5E.4090706@dachary.org> References: <55362279.5060105@dachary.org> <5555F85B.3000407@dachary.org> <555654E8.1030806@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UMiQE9nqT3THXFqOh5RjjxBDgke5LCnPQ" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:37060 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752292AbbERMr3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 08:47:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <555654E8.1030806@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Ceph Development , "Shu, Xinxin" , dzafman@redhat.com, sjust@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UMiQE9nqT3THXFqOh5RjjxBDgke5LCnPQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Sage, The following are now in the firefly branch.=20 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4697 which includes fixes for http://tr= acker.ceph.com/issues/11622 and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 OSD::load_pgs: we need to handle t= he case where an upgrade from earlier versions which ignored non-existent= pgs resurrects a pg with a prehistoric osdmap =20 Do you think we should prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? If yes the b= ranch will be handed over to QE for further testing. Cheers On 15/05/2015 22:19, Loic Dachary wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 15/05/2015 21:05, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Sage, >>> >>> On 21/04/2015 17:52, Sage Weil wrote: >>>> The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get i= nto a=20 >>>> release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashin= g=20 >>>> tests yet? >>>> >>>> The only other one I'm worried about is >>>> >>>> 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >>>> >>>> Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly = folks=20 >>>> who upgrade too? >>> >>> A backport of "OSD::load_pgs: we need to handle the case where an upg= rade from earlier versions which ignored non-existent pgs resurrects a pg= with a prehistoric osdmap" http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11429 found at= https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 has been successfully tested on f= irefly at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-05-13_00:01:26-rados-firefly-= backports---basic-multi/ and in a rados suite run that completed today ht= tp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rados. >>> >>> Provided https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 is merged, do you thi= nk we should prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >> >> As Yehuda mentioned the other open issue is the rgw multipart corrupti= on. =20 >> I'm guessing we want to include that? >=20 > Yes, we will include and test the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 = and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 backports. >=20 > Cheers >=20 >> >> sage >> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> >>>> sage >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Sage, >>>>> >>>>> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com/= issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests in= the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and ar= e being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues= /11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-inte= gration-branch-april-2015 ).=20 >>>>> >>>>> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Sho= uld we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backpor= ting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> --=20 >>>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>> >>> --=20 >>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --UMiQE9nqT3THXFqOh5RjjxBDgke5LCnPQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVZ314ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22SXwCfbHo99G0IR/n8aMHP1gCjh3Ae JM0AniHDGc8RmwAfNAMUYTMv/yST9jDc =Cc4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UMiQE9nqT3THXFqOh5RjjxBDgke5LCnPQ--