From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] PCI, MSI: Optionally free legacy PCI IRQ when enabling MSI/MSI-X
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:06:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555BFA31.5040206@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505152259480.4225@nanos>
On 2015/5/16 5:02, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> Once PCI MSI/MSI-X is enabled by the device driver, PCI device won't
>> make use of legacy PCI IRQ until PCI MSI/MSI-X is disabled again.
>> So optionally free legacy PCI IRQ when enabling MSI/MSI-X and reallocate
>> when disabling MSI/MSI-X.
>
> This is a bit odd. With your proposed change we'll have:
>
> alloc_legacy_irq()
>
> msi[x]_enable()
> free_legacy_irq()
>
> msi[x]_disable()
> alloc_legacy_irq()
Hi Thomas,
It's for safety. I'm not sure whether the device driver will
make use of legacy IRQ after calling msi[x]_disable(). I have concerns
about following pattern in PCI device drivers:
---------------------------------------------------
if (enable_msi() == SUCCESS) {
if (allocate_resource_for_msi() == SUCCESS)
return;
disable_msi();
}
use_legacy_irq()
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> And after that we shut down the device which will free the legacy irq
> again.
>
> Shouldn't we allocate the legacy irq only if we really need it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 3:12 [RFC 0/4] Introduce a mechanism to allocate PCI IRQ on demand Jiang Liu
2015-05-07 3:12 ` [RFC 1/4] PCI: Add hooks to allocate/free IRQ resources when binding/unbinding driver Jiang Liu
2015-05-19 14:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-07 3:12 ` [RFC 2/4] PCI, MSI: Optionally free legacy PCI IRQ when enabling MSI/MSI-X Jiang Liu
2015-05-15 21:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-20 3:06 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-05-20 7:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-19 15:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-19 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-05-19 15:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-05-20 3:07 ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-19 21:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 3:12 ` Jiang Liu
2015-05-07 3:12 ` [RFC 3/4] PCI, x86: Allocate PCI IRQ on demand and free it when not used anymore Jiang Liu
2015-05-07 3:12 ` [RFC 4/4] PCI: Introduce helpers to manage pci_dev->irq and pci_dev->irq_managed Jiang Liu
2015-05-19 13:35 ` [RFC 0/4] Introduce a mechanism to allocate PCI IRQ on demand Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-20 3:21 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555BFA31.5040206@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.