From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv2Qj-0001zF-W5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:44:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv2Qf-00029T-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:44:57 -0400 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:40007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv2Qf-00026o-OP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:44:53 -0400 Message-ID: <555C73AB.2090408@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:44:43 +0300 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5541B728.8020404@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <5541B728.8020404@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ABNT2 keys again List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Cc: Gerd Hoffmann A (friendly) ping? :) 30.04.2015 08:01, Michael Tokarev wrote: > There's a bug open in qemu bugtracker for several years > already, https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1038136 . > The solution appears to be trivial (see also some background > at http://blog.nielshorn.net/2011/03/qemu-and-brazilian-keyboards/ ), > but the problem is definitely still here. > > Maybe it's a time to address this finally? :) > > I don't pretend to understand any significant bit of input > handling, so am asking people who are more knowlegeable in > this area to take a look ;) > > Thanks, > > /mjt >