All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Fann <vincent_fann@realtek.com>,
	Shao Fu <shaofu@realtek.com>, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1] rtlwifi: Remove the clear interrupt routine from all drivers
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:34:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555CA977.70902@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877fs39wy8.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

On 05/20/2015 08:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> writes:
>
>> From: Vincent Fann <vincent_fann@realtek.com>
>>
>> Several of these drivers have there TX randomly blocked for 3~5 seconds while
>> measuring tx throughput (iperf). The root couse happens in rtl_pci_flush().
>> The function uses a while-loop to wait for TX queue length to decrease to 0.
>> The TX queue length counts the number of packets that are queued in the driver.
>> The driver relys on the TX OK interrupt to return skb and reduce TX queue length.
>>
>> The interrupt subroutine disables interupts, reads the interrupt registers, and
>> then clears the registers in the beginning of _rtl_pci_interrupt(). After all
>> interupts process are finished, the driver invokes enable_interrupt() to enable
>> interupts. This behavior is normal for an interrupt subroutine.
>>
>> But enable_interrupt() invokes clear_interrupt() again. This unexpected interrupt
>> clearing may cleari me fresh TX OK interrupts. These missing interrupts cause TX
>> queue length to never reduce to 0i, which causes rtl_pci_flush() to be stuck in
>> unterminated while-loop.
>>
>> This patch removes clear_interrupt() in enable_interrupt() to avoid this behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Fann <vincent_fann@realtek.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shao Fu <shaofu@realtek.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>> Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.18+]
>> ---
>>
>> Kalle,
>>
>> This patch is a little large for the current kernel and stable; however, it only
>> deletes code that is clearly wrong. I hope it will be OK.
>
> This isn't a recent regression nor a crasher (or similar) so I can't
> really justify to send this to 4.1 this late. The way I see it this
> could easily wait for 4.2, right?

OK. If any user complains about the 3-5 second hang, I'll refer then to the 
out-of-kernel repo for a fix.

Larry



  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-20 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-16  2:29 [PATCH 4.1] rtlwifi: Remove the clear interrupt routine from all drivers Larry Finger
2015-05-20 13:53 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-20 15:34   ` Larry Finger [this message]
2015-05-26 10:59 ` [4.1] " Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555CA977.70902@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaofu@realtek.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent_fann@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.