From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"c++std-parallel@accu.org" <c++std-parallel@accu.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
p796231 <Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
"mark.batty@cl.cam.ac.uk" <Mark.Batty@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"michaelw@ca.ibm.com" <michaelw@ca.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach!
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:54:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555CAE4B.4050202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150520154617.GE11498@arm.com>
On 05/20/2015 04:46 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> I'm not sure... you'd require the compiler to perform static analysis of
> loops to determine the state of the machine when they exit (if they exit!)
> in order to show whether or not a dependency is carried to subsequent
> operations. If it can't prove otherwise, it would have to assume that a
> dependency *is* carried, and it's not clear to me how it would use this
> information to restrict any subsequent dependency removing optimisations.
It'd just convert consume to acquire.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 0:55 Compilers and RCU readers: Once more unto the breach! Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 1:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-20 1:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-20 1:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-20 2:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-20 2:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 11:47 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-20 12:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 13:18 ` David Howells
2015-05-20 13:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 13:37 ` David Howells
2015-05-20 13:44 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-05-20 14:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 14:15 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-05-20 15:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 15:46 ` David Howells
2015-05-20 14:02 ` [c++std-parallel-1624] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-20 15:54 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2015-05-20 18:16 ` [c++std-parallel-1632] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 14:22 ` Michael Matz
2015-05-21 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 16:17 ` Michael Matz
2015-05-21 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 19:24 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-21 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-21 22:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-22 6:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-22 10:43 ` Richard Kenner
2015-05-22 13:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-22 13:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-26 17:37 ` [c++std-parallel-1641] " Torvald Riegel
2015-05-22 17:30 ` Will Deacon
2015-05-22 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 7:34 ` [c++std-parallel-1614] " Jens Maurer
2015-05-20 7:34 ` Jens Maurer
2015-05-20 7:34 ` Jens Maurer
2015-05-20 9:03 ` Richard Biener
2015-05-20 12:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 12:01 ` [c++std-parallel-1616] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-26 17:08 ` [c++std-parallel-1611] " Torvald Riegel
2015-05-27 1:41 ` [c++std-parallel-1651] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-14 0:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-22 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CAPUmR1aqV_cQWjE8qC9x2sfmW-1ocKKMtCgNbjZH0cJ-AO2WTg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-09-23 23:26 ` [c++std-parallel-2008] " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555CAE4B.4050202@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=Mark.Batty@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Peter.Sewell@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=c++std-parallel@accu.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelw@ca.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.