From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Christian Daudt" <bcm@fixthebug.org>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Marc Carino" <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"Gregory Fong" <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
"Wei Xu" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>,
"Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
"Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@opensource.altera.com>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:48:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555D0F39.5020900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 19.05.2015 18:12, Russell King wrote:
> All ARMv5 and older CPUs invalidate their caches in the early assembly
> setup function, prior to enabling the MMU. This is because the L1
> cache should not contain any data relevant to the execution of the
> kernel at this point; all data should have been flushed out to memory.
>
> This requirement should also be true for ARMv6 and ARMv7 CPUs - indeed,
> these typically do not search their caches when caching is disabled (as
> it needs to be when the MMU is disabled) so this change should be safe.
>
> ARMv7 allows there to be CPUs which search their caches while caching is
> disabled, and it's permitted that the cache is uninitialised at boot;
> for these, the architecture reference manual requires that an
> implementation specific code sequence is used immediately after reset
> to ensure that the cache is placed into a sane state. Such
> functionality is definitely outside the remit of the Linux kernel, and
> must be done by the SoC's firmware before _any_ CPU gets to the Linux
> kernel.
>
> Changing the data cache clean+invalidate to a mere invalidate allows us
> to get rid of a lot of platform specific hacks around this issue for
> their secondary CPU bringup paths - some of which were buggy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
[...]
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/headsmp.S | 6 ------
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/platsmp.c | 3 +--
For berlin,
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:48:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555D0F39.5020900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 19.05.2015 18:12, Russell King wrote:
> All ARMv5 and older CPUs invalidate their caches in the early assembly
> setup function, prior to enabling the MMU. This is because the L1
> cache should not contain any data relevant to the execution of the
> kernel at this point; all data should have been flushed out to memory.
>
> This requirement should also be true for ARMv6 and ARMv7 CPUs - indeed,
> these typically do not search their caches when caching is disabled (as
> it needs to be when the MMU is disabled) so this change should be safe.
>
> ARMv7 allows there to be CPUs which search their caches while caching is
> disabled, and it's permitted that the cache is uninitialised at boot;
> for these, the architecture reference manual requires that an
> implementation specific code sequence is used immediately after reset
> to ensure that the cache is placed into a sane state. Such
> functionality is definitely outside the remit of the Linux kernel, and
> must be done by the SoC's firmware before _any_ CPU gets to the Linux
> kernel.
>
> Changing the data cache clean+invalidate to a mere invalidate allows us
> to get rid of a lot of platform specific hacks around this issue for
> their secondary CPU bringup paths - some of which were buggy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
[...]
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/headsmp.S | 6 ------
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/platsmp.c | 3 +--
For berlin,
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:48:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555D0F39.5020900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 19.05.2015 18:12, Russell King wrote:
> All ARMv5 and older CPUs invalidate their caches in the early assembly
> setup function, prior to enabling the MMU. This is because the L1
> cache should not contain any data relevant to the execution of the
> kernel at this point; all data should have been flushed out to memory.
>
> This requirement should also be true for ARMv6 and ARMv7 CPUs - indeed,
> these typically do not search their caches when caching is disabled (as
> it needs to be when the MMU is disabled) so this change should be safe.
>
> ARMv7 allows there to be CPUs which search their caches while caching is
> disabled, and it's permitted that the cache is uninitialised at boot;
> for these, the architecture reference manual requires that an
> implementation specific code sequence is used immediately after reset
> to ensure that the cache is placed into a sane state. Such
> functionality is definitely outside the remit of the Linux kernel, and
> must be done by the SoC's firmware before _any_ CPU gets to the Linux
> kernel.
>
> Changing the data cache clean+invalidate to a mere invalidate allows us
> to get rid of a lot of platform specific hacks around this issue for
> their secondary CPU bringup paths - some of which were buggy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
[...]
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/headsmp.S | 6 ------
> arch/arm/mach-berlin/platsmp.c | 3 +--
For berlin,
Acked-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 16:12 [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache Russell King
2015-05-19 16:12 ` Russell King
2015-05-19 22:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-19 22:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-19 22:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-20 22:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2015-05-20 22:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-20 22:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-21 8:30 ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-21 8:30 ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-21 8:30 ` Thierry Reding
[not found] ` <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK-eh5Bv4kxaXIANfyc6IWni62ZND6+EDdj@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 21:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20150519220721.GK2067-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-19 22:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-20 18:54 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 18:54 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 18:54 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-21 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-22 7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-22 7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-22 7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 11:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 11:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 11:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdUXCy+87-pwLiJ7ynaM1AeFq0f7R3sJ4prdE3QN09z++w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 20:35 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 20:35 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 20:35 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 21:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 21:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 21:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20150617213006.GC7557-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 22:12 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:12 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:12 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <5581F0DD.60408-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 22:31 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <5581F542.708-yzvPICuk2ABMcg4IHK0kFoH6Mc4MB0Vx@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-22 10:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-05-22 10:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-05-22 10:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-06-01 10:21 ` Wei Xu
2015-06-01 10:21 ` Wei Xu
2015-06-01 10:21 ` Wei Xu
2015-07-08 1:17 ` [PATCH] ARM: BCM63xx: Remove custom secondary_startup function Florian Fainelli
2015-07-12 1:34 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555D0F39.5020900@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm@fixthebug.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dinguyen@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=marc.ceeeee@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.