From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Malte_Schr=c3=b6der?= <malte@tnxip.de>
Subject: Re: 4.1-rc4 display-port on radeon not working
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:50:14 +0200
Message-ID: <555D8E36.5080909@tnxip.de>
References: <555BB331.8060407@tnxip.de>
 <CADnq5_MiLCF3JCwMw5GJX3f=Kjc506zeomhvgcWOoLmsUmfbHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <555CBCF6.2020205@tnxip.de>
 <CADnq5_Mu4MC9Rqx6Xp_U=b6+1VzGs6x3qvkTWkYyLCb4zYW29Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="RUxd1kC5xs4PnKA7LdbsgmDnQXsPR7ThQ"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
in-reply-to: <CADnq5_Mu4MC9Rqx6Xp_U=b6+1VzGs6x3qvkTWkYyLCb4zYW29Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--RUxd1kC5xs4PnKA7LdbsgmDnQXsPR7ThQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 05/21/15 00:04, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Malte Schr=F6der <malte@tnxip.de> wro=
te:
>> On 05/20/15 17:37, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Malte Schr=F6der <malte@tnxip.de> wr=
ote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> with 4.1-rc display-port on my Tahiti XT stopped working. I used the=

>>>> firmware from http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/radeon_ucode/ as =
of
>>>> today.
>>>> Note: the display is an Asus PB278, it used to have problems with
>>>> display port negotiation, but those disappeared like a year ago.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does booting with radeon.auxch=3D0 on the kernel command line in grub=

>>> help?  Can you bisect?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>> Yes, radeon.auxch=3D0 helps. As for bisecting, I can try, but I won't =
have
>> time for that until next week.
>=20
> No need to bisect.  if auxch=3D0 helps, I know what commit broke it.
> Does the attached patch help?

Yes, this patch does fix the problem for me :)

>=20
> Alex


--=20
Gru=DF
Malte Schr=F6der
---------------------------------------------------------------------
MalteSch@gmx.de


--RUxd1kC5xs4PnKA7LdbsgmDnQXsPR7ThQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=+H34
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RUxd1kC5xs4PnKA7LdbsgmDnQXsPR7ThQ--