All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: change blktrans_getgeo rerurn value
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:22:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555D95C0.10104@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150521080511.GF11112@norris-Latitude-E6410>

On 2015年05月21日 16:05, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Brian Norris
>> <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:29:16PM +0800, Wenlin Kang wrote:
>>>> Modify function blktrans_getgeo()'s return value to -ENXIO when
>>>> dev->tr->getgeo == NULL.
>>>>
>>>> We shouldn't make the return value to 0 when dev->tr->getgeo == NULL,
>>>> because the function blktrans_getgeo() has an output value "hd_geometry"
>>>> which is usually used by some application, if return 0, it will make some
>>>> application get the wrong information.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c |    2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> index 2b0c5287..f8bb16e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int blktrans_getgeo(struct block_device *bdev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
>>>>        if (!dev->mtd)
>>>>                goto unlock;
>>>>
>>>> -     ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : 0;
>>>> +     ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : -ENXIO;
>>> Good catch. I don't think ENXIO is correct in this case, though. Maybe
>>> -EOPNOTSUPP or -ENOSYS? The latter might make more sense I guess.
>> I'd vote for -ENOTTY as this is what HDIO_GETGEIO returns
>> if the function is not implemented and blktrans_getgeo()
>> is only a wrapper around that.
> I suppose that makes more sense.
>
>> See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ioctl/hdio.txt
> But this only mentions EINVAL...
>
>> and block/ioctl.c.
> Anyway, I pushed EOPNOTSUPP, but I can fix that up if we agree.
>
> Brian
>
>

Hi  Brian

I just read block/compat_ioctl.c, in that I found the follow,

  51 static int compat_hdio_getgeo(struct gendisk *disk, struct 
block_device *bdev,
  52             struct compat_hd_geometry __user *ugeo)
  53 {
  54     struct hd_geometry geo;
  55     int ret;
  56
  57     if (!ugeo)
  58         return -EINVAL;
  59     if (!disk->fops->getgeo)
  60         return -ENOTTY;

So, as Richard said, -ENOTTY should also be OK, and before last
commit(048d87199566663e4edc4880df3703c04bcf41d9), it's  -ENOTTY, so I 
think you can modify it,
or let know whether I need to resent it again.




-- 
Thanks,
Wenlin Kang

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: change blktrans_getgeo rerurn value
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:22:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555D95C0.10104@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150521080511.GF11112@norris-Latitude-E6410>

On 2015年05月21日 16:05, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:56:21AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Brian Norris
>> <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:29:16PM +0800, Wenlin Kang wrote:
>>>> Modify function blktrans_getgeo()'s return value to -ENXIO when
>>>> dev->tr->getgeo == NULL.
>>>>
>>>> We shouldn't make the return value to 0 when dev->tr->getgeo == NULL,
>>>> because the function blktrans_getgeo() has an output value "hd_geometry"
>>>> which is usually used by some application, if return 0, it will make some
>>>> application get the wrong information.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenlin Kang <wenlin.kang@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c |    2 +-
>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> index 2b0c5287..f8bb16e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
>>>> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static int blktrans_getgeo(struct block_device *bdev, struct hd_geometry *geo)
>>>>        if (!dev->mtd)
>>>>                goto unlock;
>>>>
>>>> -     ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : 0;
>>>> +     ret = dev->tr->getgeo ? dev->tr->getgeo(dev, geo) : -ENXIO;
>>> Good catch. I don't think ENXIO is correct in this case, though. Maybe
>>> -EOPNOTSUPP or -ENOSYS? The latter might make more sense I guess.
>> I'd vote for -ENOTTY as this is what HDIO_GETGEIO returns
>> if the function is not implemented and blktrans_getgeo()
>> is only a wrapper around that.
> I suppose that makes more sense.
>
>> See https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ioctl/hdio.txt
> But this only mentions EINVAL...
>
>> and block/ioctl.c.
> Anyway, I pushed EOPNOTSUPP, but I can fix that up if we agree.
>
> Brian
>
>

Hi  Brian

I just read block/compat_ioctl.c, in that I found the follow,

  51 static int compat_hdio_getgeo(struct gendisk *disk, struct 
block_device *bdev,
  52             struct compat_hd_geometry __user *ugeo)
  53 {
  54     struct hd_geometry geo;
  55     int ret;
  56
  57     if (!ugeo)
  58         return -EINVAL;
  59     if (!disk->fops->getgeo)
  60         return -ENOTTY;

So, as Richard said, -ENOTTY should also be OK, and before last
commit(048d87199566663e4edc4880df3703c04bcf41d9), it's  -ENOTTY, so I 
think you can modify it,
or let know whether I need to resent it again.




-- 
Thanks,
Wenlin Kang


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-21  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-13  6:29 [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: change blktrans_getgeo rerurn value Wenlin Kang
2015-05-13  6:29 ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-20 19:33 ` Brian Norris
2015-05-20 19:33   ` Brian Norris
2015-05-20 19:47   ` nick
2015-05-21  6:49     ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-21  6:49       ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-21  7:37       ` Brian Norris
2015-05-21  7:37         ` Brian Norris
2015-05-21  8:01         ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-21  8:01           ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-21  7:56   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-21  7:56     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-21  8:05     ` Brian Norris
2015-05-21  8:05       ` Brian Norris
2015-05-21  8:22       ` Wenlin Kang [this message]
2015-05-21  8:22         ` Wenlin Kang
2015-05-21 10:17       ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-21 10:17         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-21 17:54         ` [PATCH] mtd: blktrans: use better error code for unimplemented ioctl() Brian Norris
2015-05-21 17:54           ` Brian Norris
2015-05-27 19:15           ` Brian Norris
2015-05-27 19:15             ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555D95C0.10104@windriver.com \
    --to=wenlin.kang@windriver.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.