All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 3/4] gnttab: make the grant table lock a read-write lock
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:16:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555DF6BE.20102@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555E0D7A020000780007CCBF@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 21/05/15 15:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 21.05.15 at 15:36, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 21/05/15 11:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 20.05.15 at 17:54, <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -827,9 +828,11 @@ __gnttab_map_grant_ref(
>>>>              if ( (wrc + rdc) == 0 )
>>>>                  err = iommu_map_page(ld, frame, frame, IOMMUF_readable);
>>>>          }
>>>> +
>>>> +        double_gt_lock(lgt, rgt);
>>>
>>> unlock. And with this code path actually used (due to the bug it's
>>> pretty clear it didn't get exercised in your testing), how does
>>> performance look like? 
>>
>> I think it will be no worse than what it was before -- this path already
>> really sucks (mapcount() loops over 1000s of entries).  I don't care
>> about this path at all.
> 
> It's kind of strange that you don't care about this case - afaict we're
> not getting there by default solely because dom0-strict mode is not
> currently the default (albeit arguably it should be).

What's your point?  Are you going to refuse this series unless it also
optimizes dom0-strict mode?

David

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-21 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-20 15:54 [PATCHv9 0/3] gnttab: Improve scaleability David Vrabel
2015-05-20 15:54 ` [PATCHv9 1/4] gnttab: per-active entry locking David Vrabel
2015-05-21  7:46   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-21 14:11     ` David Vrabel
2015-05-20 15:54 ` [PATCHv9 2/4] gnttab: introduce maptrack lock David Vrabel
2015-05-20 15:54 ` [PATCHv9 3/4] gnttab: make the grant table lock a read-write lock David Vrabel
2015-05-21 10:32   ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-21 13:36     ` David Vrabel
2015-05-21 14:20       ` David Vrabel
2015-05-21 14:53       ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-21 15:16         ` David Vrabel [this message]
2015-05-22  6:37           ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-22  8:54             ` David Vrabel
2015-05-20 15:54 ` [PATCHv9 4/4] gnttab: use per-VCPU maptrack free lists David Vrabel
2015-05-21 10:42   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555DF6BE.20102@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.