From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Proposal for a Backport tracker Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 21:05:09 +0200 Message-ID: <555E2C65.1040503@dachary.org> References: <555DC080.8050508@dachary.org> <555DD285.3050204@suse.cz> <555DF7E7.9000501@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3REUwHqBnWpoecHNji9r7b83ThTX2uXQW" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:48579 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751924AbbEUTFM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2015 15:05:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Nathan Cutler , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3REUwHqBnWpoecHNji9r7b83ThTX2uXQW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/05/2015 17:46, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> On 21/05/2015 14:41, Nathan Cutler wrote: >>>> * a backport issue is created in the "Backport" tracker and is=20 >>>> "Related" to the original issue >>> >>> Hi Loic: >>> >>> I like the idea of having backport tickets in a separate Redmine >>> subproject/issue tracker.=20 >> >> It would just be in a separate tracker, in the same project.=20 >> >>> In fact, I would go even a step further and >>> have separate subprojects for each target version (hammer backports, >>> firefly backports). >> >> Separating them in a different project / subproject would create=20 >> problems because redmine has ways to partition the subprojects that ma= ke=20 >> some things difficult. For instance not all issues can be "Related" to= =20 >> issues in other projects which is kind of annoying. My general=20 >> impression with redmine subprojects is that they tend to complexify an= d=20 >> obscure the process rather than help. Or maybe it's just that my redmi= ne=20 >> skills are not what they should be. Do you have a different experience= ? >=20 > I agree. Adding subprojects clutters up the project list, and a separa= te=20 > tracker captures this perfectly. It also means you can rank by priorit= y=20 > issues and see both bugs and backprots together (if you like). And I=20 > think (?) the related issue only works within the same project (that is= =20 > at least true with the 'duplicate' relationship). >=20 > Loic, I think this is a great idea (provided the bot does all the issue= =20 > creation). +1! I created the Backport tracker and we will migrate the pending issues & H= OWTO accordingly. Cheers >=20 > sage > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --3REUwHqBnWpoecHNji9r7b83ThTX2uXQW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVeLGYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21jxwCfRBKu1sL4k1cW2twKh0RDef0X eBwAnib07/wkiuJSOpB6cjnjZFvwe8Y4 =zvfW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3REUwHqBnWpoecHNji9r7b83ThTX2uXQW--