From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/shadow: fix uninitialized rc shadow_track_dirty_vram() Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 08:41:48 +0100 Message-ID: <555EDDBC.5030301@citrix.com> References: <555EE8D2020000780007D03A@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YvhaW-0006GN-FS for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:41:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: <555EE8D2020000780007D03A@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Tim Deegan , Roger Pau Monne List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 22/05/2015 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote: > Commit bd1b4a71b3 ("x86/shadow: fix shadow_track_dirty_vram to work on > hvm guests"), trying to mirror its HAP counterpart, deleted a couple of > assignments to rc without making sure rc is initialized on all paths. > > Coverity ID: 1299410 > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c > @@ -3518,7 +3518,7 @@ int shadow_track_dirty_vram(struct domain > unsigned long nr, > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(uint8) guest_dirty_bitmap) > { > - int rc; > + int rc = 0; > unsigned long end_pfn = begin_pfn + nr; > unsigned long dirty_size = (nr + 7) / 8; > int flush_tlb = 0; > @@ -3550,10 +3550,7 @@ int shadow_track_dirty_vram(struct domain > } > > if ( !nr ) > - { > - rc = 0; > goto out; > - } > > dirty_bitmap = vzalloc(dirty_size); > if ( dirty_bitmap == NULL ) > > >