From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: should we prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 12:43:08 +0200 Message-ID: <555F083C.9080700@dachary.org> References: <55362279.5060105@dachary.org> <5555F85B.3000407@dachary.org> <555654E8.1030806@dachary.org> <5559DF5E.4090706@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IAMsqndwNWmisJCxQvpjjBfJjDJbSvifs" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49104 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752120AbbEVKnL (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 06:43:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5559DF5E.4090706@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --IAMsqndwNWmisJCxQvpjjBfJjDJbSvifs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ping ? On 18/05/2015 14:47, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Sage, >=20 > The following are now in the firefly branch.=20 >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4697 which includes fixes for http://= tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 OSD::load_pgs: we need to handle= the case where an upgrade from earlier versions which ignored non-existe= nt pgs resurrects a pg with a prehistoric osdmap =20 >=20 > Do you think we should prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? If yes the= branch will be handed over to QE for further testing. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > On 15/05/2015 22:19, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> >> On 15/05/2015 21:05, Sage Weil wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Hi Sage, >>>> >>>> On 21/04/2015 17:52, Sage Weil wrote: >>>>> The bulk of it is ceph-objectstore-tool, which is important to get = into a=20 >>>>> release, IMO. David, are these being tested in the firefly thrashi= ng=20 >>>>> tests yet? >>>>> >>>>> The only other one I'm worried about is >>>>> >>>>> 6fd3dfa osd: do not ignore deleted pgs on startup >>>>> >>>>> Sam, I assume the recent hammer upgrade issue is would bite firefly= folks=20 >>>>> who upgrade too? >>>> >>>> A backport of "OSD::load_pgs: we need to handle the case where an up= grade from earlier versions which ignored non-existent pgs resurrects a p= g with a prehistoric osdmap" http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11429 found a= t https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 has been successfully tested on = firefly at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-05-13_00:01:26-rados-firefly= -backports---basic-multi/ and in a rados suite run that completed today h= ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#rados. >>>> >>>> Provided https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4556 is merged, do you th= ink we should prepare to release firefly v0.80.10 ? >>> >>> As Yehuda mentioned the other open issue is the rgw multipart corrupt= ion. =20 >>> I'm guessing we want to include that? >> >> Yes, we will include and test the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622= and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 backports. >> >> Cheers >> >>> >>> sage >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>>> >>>>> sage >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sage, >>>>>> >>>>>> The firefly branch has a number of fixes ( http://tracker.ceph.com= /issues/11090#Release-information ) and has been used for upgrade tests i= n the past few weeks. A few other issues have been backported since and a= re being tested in the integration branch ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issue= s/11090#teuthology-run-commitb91bbb434e6363a99a632cf3841f70f1f2549f79-int= egration-branch-april-2015 ).=20 >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you think these changes deserve a firefly v0.80.10 release ? Sh= ould we ask each lead for their approval ? Or is it better to keep backpo= rting what needs to be and wait a few weeks ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> --=20 >>>>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>> >>>> --=20 >>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >> >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --IAMsqndwNWmisJCxQvpjjBfJjDJbSvifs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVfCDwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20cqQCgqeeP+YN3Lp7jXRYuFEYfcqq6 FjwAnA18bZycteYyoo9Rvmdf7zL7maEa =fpS5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IAMsqndwNWmisJCxQvpjjBfJjDJbSvifs--