From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] xen/vm_event: Clean up control-register-write vm_events Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:45:04 +0300 Message-ID: <555F24D0.3040705@bitdefender.com> References: <1432213223-5211-1-git-send-email-rcojocaru@bitdefender.com> <555EF8AA020000780007D0A9@mail.emea.novell.com> <555F1DFF.6080700@bitdefender.com> <555F3BB8020000780007D43D@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <555F3BB8020000780007D43D@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: tim@xen.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/22/2015 03:22 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 22.05.15 at 14:15, wrote: >> While working on this I found the following in the vm_event.h header: >> >> 168 struct vm_event_debug { >> 169 uint64_t gfn; >> 170 uint32_t _pad; >> 171 }; >> >> Is this supposed to be 64 + 32 bits padding? > > I think I need to direct the question back to you. Fair enough, let me rephrase that: I don't see how that padding would be useful, and I propose to remove _pad as part of the next version of this patch (or a different smaller patch). Thanks, Razvan