From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: CephFS and the next firefly release v0.80.10 Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 22:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: <555F8BBD.90606@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KLTPi5OQ28wN2RHtKUcI6g8H8kAvbAhaJ" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49429 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030205AbbEVUEQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 16:04:16 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Gregory Farnum Cc: Ceph Development , "Shu, Xinxin" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KLTPi5OQ28wN2RHtKUcI6g8H8kAvbAhaJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Greg, The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/fi= refly (68211f695941ee128eb9a7fd0d80b615c0ded6cf) passed the fs suite (htt= p://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#fs). Do you think it is ready for QE to= start their own round of testing ? Cheers P.S. http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090#Release-information has direct = links to the pull requests merged into firefly since v0.80.9 in case you = need more context about one of them. --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --KLTPi5OQ28wN2RHtKUcI6g8H8kAvbAhaJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVfi70ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23o/wCgv1ST1olKJExeV5jLHvO5fhwV W94AoIQDgf9SWmq5PZpzg/us2Dn0TXr/ =iBMd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KLTPi5OQ28wN2RHtKUcI6g8H8kAvbAhaJ--