[RFC PATCH] EDAC: Cleanup atomic_scrub mess

[cmetcalf@ezchip.com (Chris Metcalf)]

On 05/21/2015 02:11 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov<bp@suse.de>
>
> So first of all, this atomic_scrub() function's naming is bad. It looks
> like an atomic_t helper. Change it to edac_atomic_scrub().
>
> The bigger problem is that this function is arch-specific and every new
> arch which doesn't necessarily need that functionality still needs to
> define it, otherwise EDAC doesn't compile.
>
> So instead of doing that and including arch-specific headers, have each
> arch define an EDAC_ATOMIC_SCRUB symbol which can be used in edac_mc.c
> for ifdeffery. Much cleaner.
>
> We already are doing this with another symbol - EDAC_SUPPORT. This is
> also much cleaner than having CONFIG_EDAC explicitly depend on all the
> arches which need/have EDAC support and drivers.
>
> This way I can kill the useless edac.h header in tile too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov<bp@suse.de>

Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> [for tile]

-- 
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com