All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Stop relying on magic jmp behavior for early_idt_handlers
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:59:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555F98B4.3030308@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXja3FHMT9WSZQ86ozyi8KsFKmFeR_JDDrt6GtRSLa8OA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/21/2015 11:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * early_idt_handlers is an array of entry points.  For simplicity, it's
>>> + * a real array.  We allocate nine bytes for each entry: two one-byte
>>> + * push instructions and a five-byte jump in the worst case.
>>> + */
>>> +#define EARLY_IDT_HANDLER_STRIDE 9
>>
>> So how come that two plus five equals nine? ;-)
> 
> A "one-byte push" would be pretty impressive :)
> 

Well, non-REX register pushes are just one byte.  However, these take an
immediate constant.

>>
>> Ditto for the 64-bit side.
> 
> Sounds good.  I'll do all this tomorrow and resend.
> 

Thank you!  Since I trust you, I'll send you this in advance:

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>



      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22  1:27 [PATCH v2] x86: Stop relying on magic jmp behavior for early_idt_handlers Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-22  6:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-22  6:51   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-22 20:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-22 20:59     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555F98B4.3030308@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.