From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B93D741CA for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 23:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so1694790igb.1 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/jqtJQvqrmihEkLU29HAaLu5bZuwhXIPyhmZYqxWYm4=; b=V5EVCGNMFULMPBjUonqhOk/+MEMtoyITRbJ+LHSh0gklwEk7ChffIEjmdy3/zd6Kbm tQnBjkasYn+/wq1gNB3mrGX6xclQ2WMjff+s2uZmRotuGQMnu2s284IEQuF/hyWzlXEr NMy66b+7lnoaI2Pp3uCO1I+GZIKiUIhWOmNXOwOVPwDLdCn2xaBD0G4+kEwPq7KxjzAZ KkMp67R83uYlETNYQPMZs4qZh47Zrbt7qB6V8oTLgZEAVQNSMWWqsFtM//7OMUP+uqfY 2fN40KaXReJX0mZJXV7goJtjzOV/4YJGfyCN5g4dZ8pDaFIhIXQ9PGJ3d5sG7vUpE8PZ 87EA== X-Received: by 10.50.36.72 with SMTP id o8mr5221209igj.16.1432336540315; Fri, 22 May 2015 16:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qt1sm237882igb.5.2015.05.22.16.15.39 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 May 2015 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <555FB899.9040301@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:15:37 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <5548E485.6080505@gmail.com> <555E2359.3080509@gmail.com> <8824256D-28B9-48F4-8155-2185F236B4F2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8824256D-28B9-48F4-8155-2185F236B4F2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ODROID-C1 support X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 23:15:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/21/15 17:18, Khem Raj wrote: >> On May 21, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote: >> >> >> Why would someone include your layer and not build for odroidc1 or >> wetekplay? Sometimes that's what people do ;-) (look at Angstrom, for >> example). Besides, a BSP layer should be able to play nicely with other >> layers even when its machines aren't being used :-) > This is very much desirable, in todays times. In angstrom e.g. we want to generalize feeds across > many machines for arm especially, so we can share common feeds across multiple armv7a machines > so BSP maintainers have to start thinking that their BSP layer will be put along with other BSP layers > and they not change common components mindlessly to fit for just one given machine. > > secondly more and more end users especially big companies have more than 1 machine tied into their useless > so its desirable for them to use one distro across all the product lines and hence a requirement to have > BSP layers play well with each others. Shouldn't this be true of distro layers as well? Simply included meta-angstrom in conf/bblayers.conf causes one's DISTRO to be set to angstrom, even if they select poky in conf/local.conf.