From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix wrong check in ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 14:12:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55601A42.8080803@huawei.com> (raw)
contig_blocks gotten from ocfs2_extent_map_get_blocks cannot be compared
with clusters_to_alloc. So convert it to clusters first.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Cc: Weiwei Wang <wangww631@huawei.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 8 +++++---
fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
index d3eccc0..d922365 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
unsigned char blocksize_bits = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits;
unsigned long max_blocks = bh_result->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits;
unsigned long len = bh_result->b_size;
- unsigned int clusters_to_alloc = 0;
+ unsigned int clusters_to_alloc = 0, contig_clusters = 0;
cpos = ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(inode->i_sb, iblock);
@@ -560,8 +560,10 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
/* fill hole, allocate blocks can't be larger than the size
* of the hole */
clusters_to_alloc = ocfs2_clusters_for_bytes(inode->i_sb, len);
- if (clusters_to_alloc > contig_blocks)
- clusters_to_alloc = contig_blocks;
+ contig_clusters = ocfs2_clusters_for_blocks(inode->i_sb,
+ contig_blocks);
+ if (clusters_to_alloc > contig_clusters)
+ clusters_to_alloc = contig_clusters;
/* allocate extent and insert them into the extent tree */
ret = ocfs2_extend_allocation(inode, cpos,
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
index 460c6c3..690ddc6 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
@@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ static inline u64 ocfs2_clusters_to_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
return (u64)clusters << c_to_b_bits;
}
+static inline u32 ocfs2_clusters_for_blocks(struct super_block *sb,
+ u64 blocks)
+{
+ int b_to_c_bits = OCFS2_SB(sb)->s_clustersize_bits -
+ sb->s_blocksize_bits;
+
+ blocks += (1 << b_to_c_bits) - 1;
+ return (u32)(blocks >> b_to_c_bits);
+}
+
static inline u32 ocfs2_blocks_to_clusters(struct super_block *sb,
u64 blocks)
{
--
1.8.4.3
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-23 6:12 Joseph Qi [this message]
2015-05-28 3:41 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix wrong check in ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks WeiWei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55601A42.8080803@huawei.com \
--to=joseph.qi@huawei.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.