From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Bo Tu <tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 5/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 049
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 19:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5560BE74.4080205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432257981-10411-6-git-send-email-tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 22.05.2015 03:26, Bo Tu wrote:
> when creating an image qemu-img enable us specifying the size of the
> image using -o size=xx options. But when we specify an invalid size
> such as a negtive size then different platform gives different result.
>
> parse_option_size() function in util/qemu-option.c will be called to
> parse the size, a cast was called in the function to cast the input
> (saved as a double in the function) size to an unsigned int64 value,
> when the input is a negtive value or exceeds the maximum of uint64, then
> the result is undefined.
>
> Language spec 6.3.1.4 Real floating and integers:
> the result of this assignment/cast is undefined if the float is not
> in the open interval (-1, U<type>_MAX+1).
>
> Signed-off-by: Bo Tu <tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/049.out | 10 ++++------
> util/qemu-option.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/049.out b/tests/qemu-iotests/049.out
> index 9f93666..b8790f9 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/049.out
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/049.out
> @@ -95,17 +95,15 @@ qemu-img create -f qcow2 TEST_DIR/t.qcow2 -- -1024
> qemu-img: Image size must be less than 8 EiB!
>
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o size=-1024 TEST_DIR/t.qcow2
> -qemu-img: qcow2 doesn't support shrinking images yet
> -qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.qcow2: Could not resize image: Operation not supported
> -Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=-1024 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
> +qemu-img: Parameter 'size' expects a non-negative number below 2^64
> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.qcow2: Invalid options for file format 'qcow2'
>
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 TEST_DIR/t.qcow2 -- -1k
> qemu-img: Image size must be less than 8 EiB!
>
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o size=-1k TEST_DIR/t.qcow2
> -qemu-img: qcow2 doesn't support shrinking images yet
> -qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.qcow2: Could not resize image: Operation not supported
> -Formatting 'TEST_DIR/t.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=-1024 encryption=off cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
> +qemu-img: Parameter 'size' expects a non-negative number below 2^64
> +qemu-img: TEST_DIR/t.qcow2: Invalid options for file format 'qcow2'
>
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 TEST_DIR/t.qcow2 -- 1kilobyte
> qemu-img: Invalid image size specified! You may use k, M, G, T, P or E suffixes for
> diff --git a/util/qemu-option.c b/util/qemu-option.c
> index fda4e5f..57b20c5 100644
> --- a/util/qemu-option.c
> +++ b/util/qemu-option.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,11 @@ void parse_option_size(const char *name, const char *value,
>
> if (value != NULL) {
> sizef = strtod(value, &postfix);
> + if (sizef < 0 || sizef > UINT64_MAX) {
> + error_set(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE, name, \
> + "a non-negative number below 2^64");
> + return;
> + }
> switch (*postfix) {
> case 'T':
> sizef *= 1024;
Well, normally we don't use backslashes at the end of a line except for
in macro definitions, but neither is there something about this in
CODING_STYLE nor does checkpatch complain, so:
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 1:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 1/7] qemu-iotests: qemu machine type support Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 2/7] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults and fix 067, 071, 081 and 087 Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 3/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 041 Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 4/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 055 Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 5/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 049 Bo Tu
2015-05-23 17:52 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 6/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 051 Bo Tu
2015-05-22 1:26 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 7/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 130 Bo Tu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-25 3:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 5/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 049 Bo Tu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5560BE74.4080205@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.