From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Subject: preparing v0.80.11
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 10:35:56 +0200
Message-ID: <5562DEEC.5060602@dachary.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="pPV2F9mchU05Lpq2JKa8SAOCaB2Ca4qNi"
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:50265 "EHLO
	smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750947AbbEYIgB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 25 May 2015 04:36:01 -0400
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--pPV2F9mchU05Lpq2JKa8SAOCaB2Ca4qNi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Nathan,

Although v0.80.10 is not out yet, the odds of a discovering a problem tha=
t would require an additional backport are low. I think you can start wit=
h v0.80.11 without further delay :-)

Cheers

--=20
Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


--pPV2F9mchU05Lpq2JKa8SAOCaB2Ca4qNi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlVi3uwACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21mmQCfaimjB9PfiOa1B5uA5TKNAaQI
ptQAoI+ImdeFKdgmtKCL/7cS37sX6N/5
=bjqy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pPV2F9mchU05Lpq2JKa8SAOCaB2Ca4qNi--