From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nm.newmedia-net.de ([217.113.179.122] helo=webmail.newmedia-net.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ywxwa-0006n2-It for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:21:49 +0000 References: <1431434736-7077-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <874mn68jl7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87oal83kv4.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <5563577E.4020208@dd-wrt.com> <5563584A.80604@candelatech.com> <55636088.1080506@dd-wrt.com> <55636198.8020802@candelatech.com> From: Sebastian Gottschall Message-ID: <55637637.8020103@dd-wrt.com> Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 21:21:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55636198.8020802@candelatech.com> Subject: Re: request: ACK timing setting required List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear , ath10k@lists.infradead.org Am 25.05.2015 um 19:53 schrieb Ben Greear: > > > On 05/25/2015 10:48 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >> Am 25.05.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Ben Greear: >>> >>> >>> On 05/25/2015 10:10 AM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> could it be possible to add a ACK timing feature to the ath10k >>>> firmware (QCA9880 internal register 0x8014, mask 0x3FFF) >>> >>> You just need ability to set this register to some value? >>> >>> If so, probably something I could add to CT firmware, at least. >>> >> not alone. this register is rewritten on each reset (channel change >> etc.) so it needs to be correct handled. >> yes. just writing and handling the ack value would be enough. the >> math behind is no problem. >> otherwise its impossible todo long range links with ath10k. (LSDK >> based firmware from compex do support this feature unlike ath10k) > > I'll see if I can add this to my firmware, probably will be a few days > before I can get > time to work on it. Will post to list when I have a FW build ready > for testing. do you plan to bring up your codebase to 10.2.4 with api 5 one time? or is the code already up to date, just using the old api? > > Thanks, > Ben > _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k