All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:25:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55647454.50401@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150520234558.GB31753@codeaurora.org>



On 21/05/15 00:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/27, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> The clocks for the CPUs are provided by SCP and are managed by this
>> clock driver. So the cpufreq device needs to be added only after the
>> clock get registered and removed when this driver is unloaded.
>>
>> This patch manages the cpufreq virtual device based on the clock
>> availability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> The cpufreq device can't handle probe defer? I suppose we do it
> this way because we need to create a platform device somewhere
> and this is the best place to do so?
>

Correct, unless the communication with the SCP firmware is established
and the CPU clocks are registered, it makes no sense to register CPUFreq
virtual device. This seems to be best place IMO.

And yes, thanks to the absence of platform code on ARM64, where such
code was traditionally stashed away and got away with such scenarios.
Let me if you disagree with this or have any other suggestions.

Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-26 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-27 11:40 [PATCH 0/4] ARM64: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support Sudeep Holla
     [not found] ` <1430134846-24320-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-04-27 11:40   ` [PATCH 1/4] mailbox: add support for System Control and Power Interface(SCPI) protocol Sudeep Holla
2015-04-27 11:40     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-28  7:36     ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-28  8:41       ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-28 13:54     ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-04-29 10:53       ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-29 11:43         ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-04-29 12:25           ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-04-29 13:08             ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-30  8:49             ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-04-29 13:01           ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-13 16:52     ` Jassi Brar
2015-05-13 17:09       ` Sudeep Holla
     [not found]         ` <55538540.1010505-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-14  7:02           ` Jassi Brar
2015-05-14  7:02             ` Jassi Brar
2015-05-14  7:30             ` Jassi Brar
     [not found]               ` <CABb+yY0J1j=wMaKj+1nohU7qJpVS83BD_AX3Mf56T5+6V6+NOA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-14  8:25                 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-14  8:25                   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-27 11:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] clk: add support for clocks provided by SCP(System Control Processor) Sudeep Holla
2015-05-07 10:17   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-20 23:43   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-26 13:14     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-27 11:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] clk: scpi: add support for cpufreq virtual device Sudeep Holla
2015-05-20 23:45   ` Stephen Boyd
2015-05-26 13:25     ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-04-27 11:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver Sudeep Holla
2015-04-29  5:44   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-29  9:39     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-01 13:19   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-05-01 13:32     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-01 14:12       ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-05-01 14:15         ` Sudeep Holla
2015-05-01 17:10           ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-05-01 17:14             ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-27 18:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] ARM64: add SCPI mailbox protocol, clock and CPUFreq support Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
2015-04-28  8:47   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-04-28 14:21   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55647454.50401@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tixy@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.