From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marc Sune <marc.sune@bisdn.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Added ETH_SPEED_CAP bitmap in
	rte_eth_dev_info
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:09:25 +0200
Message-ID: <55648CA5.6080706@bisdn.de>
References: <1431387946-29950-1-git-send-email-marc.sune@bisdn.de>	<1431387946-29950-2-git-send-email-marc.sune@bisdn.de>
 <20150526080307.50ce1077@urahara>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mx.bisdn.de (mx.bisdn.de [185.27.182.31])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB12E62
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:09:28 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20150526080307.50ce1077@urahara>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>



On 26/05/15 17:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 01:45:45 +0200
> Marc Sune <marc.sune@bisdn.de> wrote:
>
>> +/**
>> + * Ethernet device information
>> + */
>>   struct rte_eth_dev_info {
>>   	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< Device PCI information. */
>>   	const char *driver_name; /**< Device Driver name. */
>> @@ -924,6 +947,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info {
>>   	uint16_t vmdq_queue_base; /**< First queue ID for VMDQ pools. */
>>   	uint16_t vmdq_queue_num;  /**< Queue number for VMDQ pools. */
>>   	uint16_t vmdq_pool_base;  /**< First ID of VMDQ pools. */
>> +	uint16_t speed_capa;  /**< Supported speeds bitmap. */
>>   };
>>   
> Since you are changing size of key structure, this is an ABI change.

Yes. This means target would be 2.2?

I will send the new version anyway to further discuss, and will rebase 
again once necessary.

Marc