From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:25:25 +0200 Message-ID: <55649E75.20802@dachary.org> References: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> <1094270224.6326426.1432656826948.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1reWdnFp2gsQsgU13mrol7Eus7NMN021" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:51129 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751043AbbEZQZ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 12:25:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1094270224.6326426.1432656826948.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --k1reWdnFp2gsQsgU13mrol7Eus7NMN021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yuri, If I'm not mistaken http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11660 is the last issu= e blocking v0.94.2. Is there another one I don't see ? Cheers On 26/05/2015 18:13, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic >=20 > This hammer release QE validation is taking unusually long time and has= issues that has to be clarified.=20 >=20 > All test results were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/1149= 2 >=20 > There are several reasons contributing to slowness of this validation, = product related as well as infrastructure related, also high amount of te= sts make turn around time slower as well. >=20 > I think some suites, e.g. rados and upgrades for example will have to b= e re-run after issues had been clarified/fixed. >=20 > rados, krbd, knfs, samba suite test results need reviews by the team le= ads. >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is rea= dy for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commi= t/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the tests r= un are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 >=20 > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794= ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0= 021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 >=20 > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/i= ssues/11492#QE-Validation >=20 > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on r= gw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suit= e because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. >=20 > The other two issues listed as blockers are >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to h= ammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that= can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --k1reWdnFp2gsQsgU13mrol7Eus7NMN021 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVknnUACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22KZQCgpZxfjGHV3yUmrF+5KCd2kcUm p8YAnimAEUNotihkiDVj2qGs1jnD3JZH =5EqW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1reWdnFp2gsQsgU13mrol7Eus7NMN021--