From: Crestez Dan Leonard <cdleonard@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: __inet_hash_connect port_offset parameter
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:25:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5565E202.8010202@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I'm confused about the port_offset parameter to __inet_hash_connect.
When allocating the local port for an outgoing TCP connection the port search looks something like this:
static u32 hint;
u32 offset = hint + port_offset;
inet_get_local_port_range(net, &low, &high);
remaining = (high - low) + 1;
for (i = 1; i <= remaining; i++) {
port = low + (i + offset) % remaining;
/* check port is free */
The port_offset is calculated for v4 and v6 based on a hash of src/dst addresses, presumably in order to improve security.
I see a few issues with this:
- The port_offset is calculated even if the local port was already assigned via bind. This wastes a few cycles.
- Keeping the last searched port as a static variable is a bad idea on multicore cpus. Starting a lot of connections to the same target will result in lock contention in the bind hash. This is probably only visible in highly synthetic tests.
- When doing a port search at bind() time the search starts from "prandom_32()". Is this "less secure" for port allocation? I bet most applications are not aware of this difference.
Wouldn't it be better to use the same local port search mechanism at both bind (inet_csk_get_port) and connect (__inet_hash_connect) time, based on starting from a random point? It would also make connecting slightly faster.
Regards,
Leonard
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 15:25 Crestez Dan Leonard [this message]
2015-05-27 16:18 ` __inet_hash_connect port_offset parameter Eric Dumazet
2015-05-27 16:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next] tcp: connect() from bound sockets can be faster Eric Dumazet
2015-05-27 18:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5565E202.8010202@gmail.com \
--to=cdleonard@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.