From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 23:16:18 +0200 Message-ID: <55663422.1000900@dachary.org> References: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> <694044148.7711595.1432761176105.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OJhAPbTQiMjoiud7JijuSp7opwvdUbRnM" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:52022 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751064AbbE0VQV (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 May 2015 17:16:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <694044148.7711595.1432761176105.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OJhAPbTQiMjoiud7JijuSp7opwvdUbRnM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/05/2015 23:12, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > QE validation status. >=20 > All detailed information is summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issue= s/11492 >=20 > Team leads pls review for do "go"-"no-go" decision. >=20 > Issues to be considered: >=20 > rados - passed ~2.8K jobs, listed issues (#11660, #11661) are not block= ers=20 > (NOTE: we also agreed to use the "0/7th" rule for future point releases= , e.g. passing "--subset 0/7" will be sufficient for release) >=20 > knfs - #11789, #11790 - per Sage - not blockers; Greg, John - agreed? >=20 > samba - I assumed that failured in http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2= 015-05-18_13:46:55-samba-hammer-testing-basic-multi/ due to #6613, Greg p= ls confirm. >=20 > upgrade/client-upgrade - blocked by #11546 (3 jobs passed) > upgrade/firefly-x - blocked by #11546 > upgrade/dumpling-firefly-x - blocked by #11546 >=20 > Sage, Loic are you willing to push this release out without upgrade sui= tes run due to packaging issues (NOTE: upgrade/giant-x -> hammer passed o= n all distros)? IMHO there should at least be a run that involves installing packages on = all distributions for which #11546 is a blocker (all debs). > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is rea= dy for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commi= t/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the tests r= un are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 >=20 > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794= ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0= 021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 >=20 > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/i= ssues/11492#QE-Validation >=20 > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on r= gw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suit= e because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. >=20 > The other two issues listed as blockers are >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to h= ammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that= can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --OJhAPbTQiMjoiud7JijuSp7opwvdUbRnM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlVmNCIACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21OHwCfRDwUXNiqFG0evEw+/xByN20m sDoAoLRkAIIOqONNBCg9d+/7maaQKMsi =j9xe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OJhAPbTQiMjoiud7JijuSp7opwvdUbRnM--