From: tu bo <tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com,
mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:29:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556699C5.2030306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150526115555.GG24077@noname.str.redhat.com>
Hi Kevin:
On 05/26/2015 07:55 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 25.05.2015 um 05:30 hat Bo Tu geschrieben:
>> Bo Tu (3):
>> qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 049
>> qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 051
>> qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 130
>>
>> Xiao Guang Chen (4):
>> qemu-iotests: qemu machine type support
>> qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults and fix 067,071,081 and 087
>> qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 041
>> qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 055
> Is this supposed to be v10? There was already a v9 thread a few days
> earlier.
Max helped to review v9, and v9 is fine for him, so v9 is the final
version. This is the reason why I didn't create v10.
>
> Is this still an RFC series, as the subject indicates, or is it meant
> for inclusion?
This is my first task for qemu which I took over from Xiao Guang Chen,
and I'm not sure if I understand it well. Does 'RFC' mean 'Reference
for Candidate'? please correct me if I'm wrong. If other actions I
need to take, please let me know.
Anyway, this patch series is final version. thanks
>
> Kevin
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-25 3:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 1/7] qemu-iotests: qemu machine type support Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 2/7] qemu-iotests: run qemu with -nodefaults and fix 067, 071, 081 and 087 Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 3/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 041 Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 4/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 055 Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 5/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 049 Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 6/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 051 Bo Tu
2015-05-25 3:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 7/7] qemu-iotests: s390x: fix test 130 Bo Tu
2015-05-26 11:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v9 0/7] Update tests/qemu-iotests failing cases for the s390 platform Kevin Wolf
2015-05-28 4:29 ` tu bo [this message]
2015-05-28 10:01 ` Thomas Huth
2015-05-28 10:27 ` tu bo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-22 1:26 Bo Tu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556699C5.2030306@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.