From: Xuebing Wang <xbing6@gmail.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: niranjan Patil <Niranjan.Patil@infocus.com>,
fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
richard Jiang <Richard.Jiang@infocus.com>
Subject: Freescale iMX6SL SSI (I2S master mode) Rising edge vs Falling edge
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:02:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5566BD87.6040505@gmail.com> (raw)
Nicolin and alsa-devel community:
Source code in fsl_ssi.c shows below in function fsl_ssi_set_dai_fmt():
-----------
switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_FORMAT_MASK) {
case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
... ...
/* Data on rising edge of bclk, frame low, 1clk before data */
strcr |= CCSR_SSI_STCR_TFSI | CCSR_SSI_STCR_TSCKP
| CCSR_SSI_STCR_TXBIT0 | CCSR_SSI_STCR_TEFS;
break;
-----------
According to iMX6SL reference manual, 'TSCKP = 1' means "Data clocked
out on *falling* edge of bit clock." (for I2S master mode), rather than
"Data on rising edge of bclk in the comments". This means this comment
in the source code is *partially* WRONG, am I correct?
However, RSCKP is = 1 (for receiving), it means "Data latched on rising
edge of bit clock", which is correct.
Also, I am not sure why there is inconsistency in iMX6SL reference
manual (48.9 SSI Memory Map/Register Definition), that TSCKP = 1 (for
transmitting) is FALLING_EDGE, but RSCKP = 1 (for receiving) is RISING_EDGE.
Note: SSI (I2S master mode) works perfect on my hardware, I did not
observe anything wrong.
Thanks.
--
Xuebing
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 7:02 Xuebing Wang [this message]
2015-05-28 7:09 ` Freescale iMX6SL SSI (I2S master mode) Rising edge vs Falling edge Nicolin Chen
2015-05-28 7:15 ` Xuebing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5566BD87.6040505@gmail.com \
--to=xbing6@gmail.com \
--cc=Niranjan.Patil@infocus.com \
--cc=Richard.Jiang@infocus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.