From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH 00/10] Making new mounts of proc and sysfs as safe as bind mounts (take 2) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 23:12:09 +0200 Message-ID: <556784A9.10809@nod.at> References: <87pp63jcca.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87siaxuvik.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87wq004im1.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20150528140839.GD28842@ubuntumail> <87lhg8pwvz.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87fv6gikfn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <55677EE4.2040903@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Kenton Varda Cc: Linux API , Linux Containers , Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , Seth Forshee , "Eric W. Biederman" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux FS Devel , Tejun Heo , Michael Kerrisk-manpages List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Am 28.05.2015 um 23:07 schrieb Kenton Varda: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 28.05.2015 um 22:12 schrieb Kenton Varda: >>> We never mount sysfs in Sandstorm. >> >> sysfs is ABI and applications depend on it. >> Even glibc is using sysfs. Currently it has >> fallback paths but these may go away... > > Off-topic, but Sandstorm isn't intended to provide a full Linux ABI. > It is intended to provide a secure sandbox that can run apps that have > been explicitly ported to Sandstorm. More background if you're interested: Ahh, the application needs to be Sandstorm aware. I was missing that detail. Thanks for pointing that out! Thanks, //richard